An excerpt from Marilynne Robinson’s *The Death of Adam*

“History is a nightmare, generally speaking, and the effect of religion, where its authority has been claimed, has been horrific as well as benign.  Even in saying this, however, we are judging history in terms religion has supplied.  The proof of this is that, in the twentieth century, “scientific” policies of extermination, undertaken in the case of Stalin to purge society of parasitic or degenerate or recalcitrant elements, and in the case of Hitler to purge it of the weak or defective or, racially speaking, marginally human, have taken horror to new extremes.  Their scale and relentlessness have been owed to the disarming of moral response by theories authorized by the word “science,” which, quite inappropriately, has been used as if it meant “truth.”  Surely it is fair to say that science is to the “science,” that inspired exterminations as Christianity is to the “Christianity” that inspired Crusades.  In both cases the human genius for finding pretexts seized upon the most prestigious institution of the culture and appropriated a great part of its language and resources and legitimacy.  In the case of religion, the best and worst of it have been discredited together.  In the case of science, neither has been discredited.  The failure in both instances to distinguish best from worst means that both science and religion are effetively lost to us in terms of disciplining or enlarging our thinking.

“These are not the worst consequences, however.  The modern fable is that science has exposed religion as a delusion and more or less supplanted it.  But science cannot serve in the place of religion because it cannot generate an ethics or a morality.  It can give us no reason to prefer a child to a dog, or to choose honorable poverty over fraudulent wealth.  It can give us no grounds for preferring what is excellent to what is sensationalistic.  And this is more or less where we are now.”

– Marilynne Robinson, “Darwinism” in The Death of Adam:
Essays on Modern Thought
(New York, Picador, 1998, 2005), 70-71

Find the book here on Amazon:
amazon.com/Death-Adam-Essays-Modern-Thought

While I am personally an ex-Catholic and Ms. Hamilton’s blog is called Public Catholic, she makes an important point and makes it very well. It’s not enough to say that we’re against something. We have to clearly define what we are for and then sincerely attempt to live that out.

Copernicus said…

To know the mighty works of God, to comprehend His wisdom and majesty and power; to appreciate, in degree, the wonderful workings of His laws, surely all this must be a pleasing and acceptable mode of worship to the Most High, to whom ignorance cannot be more grateful than knowledge.*

  • Nicolaus Copernicus (Mikołaj Kopernik) was a Renaissance astronomer and the first person to formulate a comprehensive heliocentric cosmology which displaced the Earth from the center of the universe.
  • Copernicus’ epochal book, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres), published just before his death in 1543, is often regarded as the starting point of modern astronomy and the defining epiphany that began the scientific revolution. His heliocentric model, with the Sun at the center of the universe, demonstrated that the observed motions of celestial objects can be explained without putting Earth at rest in the center of the universe. His work stimulated further scientific investigations, becoming a landmark in the history of science that is often referred to as the Copernican Revolution.
  • Among the great polymaths of the Renaissance, Copernicus was a mathematician, astronomer, physician, quadrilingual polyglot, classical scholar, translator, artist, Catholic cleric, jurist, governor, military leader, diplomat, and economist. Among his many responsibilities, astronomy figured as little more than an avocation — yet it was in that field that he made his mark upon the world.**
*I first came across this quotation in The Language of God (2006) by Francis Collins pp. 230-31.
It is also in quoted in Poland: The Knight Among Nations (1907) by Louis E. Van Norman, p. 290; which can be found online here: http://openlibrary.org/books/OL20436595M/Poland_The_Knight_Among_Nations
**The biographical information is copied from: http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Nicolaus_Copernicus

Rob Bell’s Newest Book

See the advanced info on Love Wins at HarperCollins.  In case any of us ever wondered whether universalism was lurking behind Rob Bell’s more obscure teachings in books or Noomas, he is making that clear to one and all with this book.  At least that’s what his publisher’s website is saying.  Also check out the brief video by Bell off to the side.  For the record, Brian McLaren recommends the book.  Admittedly, I haven’t read it yet, but I think I detect some errors in doctrine already.

 Love Wins by Rob Bell

Love Wins by Rob Bell